Background
Never Again.
Since 1979, with the invasion of the US embassy in Tehran and the
initial hostage taking of 66 Americans, and down to the 52 staff held captive
for 444 days, the Islamic Republic of Iran (IRI) has been waging an asymmetric
warfare against the United States, with the latter launching Operation Epic
Fury in February 2026 after 47 years of passivity of the US Government (USG).
To the vociferous anti-Trumper crowd in the Western World, the United
States’ military campaigns in Iran violate international law. The war is met
with total indignation on social media, mainstream media, and even in the halls
of the US Congress. From the first salvo of air attacks on February 28 to this
day, the relentless accusation against President Trump of ushering the country
into another forever war is also echoed overseas. Leaders of the European Union
and NATO, especially Spain, Germany, France, and the United Kingdom, have
castigated President Trump for not informing them of his plan to invade Iran,
then distanced themselves later on from the United States’ military campaigns,
stating that the Iran War is not their war.
The Democrat Party’s calls to end the war and its condemnation of
sending the Americans’ sons and daughters to harm’s way grew louder even more
when the former Director of NCTC, Joe Kent, resigned from his position,
claiming that in his good conscience he could not support Operation Epic Fury
because there is no imminent threat from Iran.
If the USG considered the IRI as a State-Sponsored Terrorist
Regime--referring to a foreign government providing supplies, training, and
other forms of support to non-state terrorist organizations--the Iranian
government should then be treated with a higher degree of concern. More so, the
IRGC and its proxies, like Hezbollah, are considered to be Religious
Terrorists—groups that use violence to further what they see as a divinely
commanded purpose and who value death more than life itself.
Following the expiration of a 10-day deadline for the Islamic Republic
of Iran to comply with nuclear and security demands of the USG, President Trump
ordered the launch of Operation Epic Fury on February 28, in coordination with
the Israel IDF’s Operation Roaring Lion.
The operation is a large-scale, coordinated US military and cyber
campaign aimed at the systematic degradation of the IRGC’s offensive
capabilities. The USG has articulated four primary military objectives for the
campaign:
- Permanent
Denuclearization: To ensure the IRGC never obtains a
nuclear weapon by neutralizing remaining and reconstituted nuclear
infrastructure.
- Destruction of
Missile Infrastructure: To raze the IRGC missile
industry to the ground by destroying missile stockpiles, launchers, and
production factories.
- Neutralization of
Naval Forces: To annihilate the IRGC Navy and other
security infrastructure used to project power and threaten regional
stability, especially in the Strait of Hormuz.
- Degradation of
Proxy Networks: To significantly weaken IRGC’s regional
"terrorist proxies," including Hezbollah, Hamas, and the
Houthis, preventing them from further destabilizing the Middle East.
I disagree with Joe Kent. Based on my assessment of the pugnacious
relationship and antipathy of the Islamic Republic of Iran to the United
States, the Shiite regime, which calls the United States the Great Satan, poses
imminent danger, not an immediate threat, to the Americans. I arrived at this
conclusion using the analytical process called CHIPS (© 2016)—Capability,
History, Intention, Pronouncement, and Situation. CHIPS is a strategic
analytical method that I used to assess the Islamic Republic of Iran’s overall
composition and the threat it poses to US national security.
This study uses Open Sources, which are derived from periodicals,
research studies, and news publications; as such, this presentation can be
identified as an Open Source Intelligence (OSINT).
Capability
How strong are the IRI security forces? The IRI security infrastructure
is divided into three forces: the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), the
regular Islamic Republic of Iran Army (ARTESH), and the volunteer militia known
as BASIJ. For this study, this paper will cover only the IRGC and its Quds
Force, as they have the capacity to affect and threaten the US government’s
national security both domestically and abroad.
IRGC is Iran's elite military, intelligence, and economic powerhouse,
with an estimated 125,000-210,000 personnel, focusing on the Ayatollah Regime’s
survival, asymmetric warfare, and regional influence. It also controls Iran's
ballistic missile arsenal, drone programs, and the Quds Force (QF), which
manages proxy networks across the Middle East and East Asia, like Hamas (Gaza),
Hezbollah (Lebanon), Hashd al-Sha'abi (Iraq), National Defence
Forces (Syria), Houthis (Yemen), Zainabiyoun Brigade (Pakistan), and the
Fatemiyoun Division (Afghanistan), to name a few.
Before Operation Epic Fury, the IRGC possessed
the Middle East's largest missile arsenal, boasting roughly 2,500 missiles,
including advanced long-range ballistic and cruise missiles (e.g., Sejil,
Khorramshahr-4) and over 2,000 drones. The arsenal was designed for saturation
attacks on regional targets and to maintain a second-strike capability. This
study focuses on the IRGC’s Force Projection Capability beyond Iran.
Missile Capabilities
- IRGC Aerospace Force:
Operates Iran's largest-in-region
missile inventory and UAV capabilities, featuring underground missile
silos, enabling strikes across the Middle East.
- Ballistic
Missiles: The arsenal included weapons with ranges
of up to 2,000 km, capable of striking targets throughout the region. Key
missile models included the Sejil (1,550-mile range), Kheibar
(1,240-mile range), Ghadr, and Khorramshahr.
- Cruise Missiles: Advanced
long-range anti-ship missiles were deployed to create a defensive barrier
and threaten shipping lanes in the Strait of Hormuz.
- Missile Cities:
The IRGC maintained extensive underground storage facilities for these
missiles, ensuring survivability against initial strikes.
- Precision:
Recent exercises highlighted improved precision in striking targets, as
evidenced by attacks on Israel and Gulf Cooperation Council countries.
Drone and Naval Capabilities
- UAVs (Drones):
The IRGC relied heavily on one-way attack drones (similar to the Shahed
series) for offensive operations.
- Navy Assets:
The IRGC Navy operated hundreds of
fast-attack boats and naval drones intended to threaten shipping in the
Strait of Hormuz.
- Regional
Proliferation: The IRGC was noted for providing advanced
drones and missiles to regional allies like Lebanese Hezbollah.
Strategic Posture
- Second-Strike
Doctrine: The arsenal was configured so that even
if a first strike destroyed 50% of the IRGC weapons, over 1,000 missiles
would remain to retaliate and overwhelm regional defenses.
- Production
Capability: Iran's rate of producing new missiles and
drones was outpacing the ability of regional defenses to create
interceptors.
- Missile Response: In
the initial days of the conflict, the IRGC demonstrated its capability by
launching over 500 ballistic missiles and 2,000 drones.
Quds Force is also active in the Western Hemisphere, focusing on
intelligence gathering, clandestine operations, and developing logistical
networks. The QF operators are concentrating on Venezuela, the Tri-Border Area
(Argentina, Brazil, Paraguay), and on establishing anti-US influence in the
region. IRGC-QF also has a presence in Mexico and Canada, as reported by the
news media. There is no doubt that the existence of IRGC-QF operators at the
United States’ doorsteps elevates the terrorists’ threats to homeland security.
History
The IRI Government, through the IRGC, has engaged in a long-term,
asymmetric campaign against the United States since the 1980s, primarily using
proxy militias, intelligence operations, and naval harassment to avoid direct
conventional war. Key actions include training insurgents in Iraq, attacks in
Lebanon, and provocations in the Persian Gulf, aiming to force US military
forces' withdrawal from the Middle East.
Key Historical Conflict Points
- 1979 US Embassy
Invasion and Hostage Taking: The crisis lasted from
November 4, 1979, to January 20, 1981, during the time of President Jimmy
Carter (D). Iranian militants seized the US embassy in Tehran, initially
taking 66 Americans hostage, and while several hostages were released
early, 52 Americans were held captive for 444 days.
- 1983 Car Bombing
in Beirut: Islamic Jihad, an Iran-backed terrorist
group, staged a suicide car bombing at the US Embassy in Beirut, killing
17 Americans.
- 1983 US Barracks
Bombing: The IRGC was instrumental in forming,
training, and funding Hezbollah, which carried out the 1983 US Marine
barracks bombing in Beirut, killing 241 US personnel.
- 1984 Kidnapping of
William Buckley: Hezbollah, supported by the IRGC,
kidnapped William Buckley, the CIA station chief in Beirut, Lebanon. He
was held for approximately 15 months and subjected to brutal torture
intended to force him to reveal CIA intelligence networks. Some
intelligence reports also suggest he was moved to Tehran, Iran, where he was tortured
in the basement of the Iranian foreign ministry. The interrogation has
resulted in the decimation of the CIA network in Lebanon and had a big
effect on the intelligence collection in the Middle East Operation. Ali
Larijani was the IRGC Commander in the 1980s and supervised Hezbollah in
Lebanon.
- 1987-1988 Tanker
War: The IRGC Navy mined the Persian Gulf, resulting in
Operation Praying Mantis, where the US Navy forces destroyed Iranian oil
platforms and naval ships.
- 2003–2011 Iraq
War: The Quds Force supplied Shiite militants with
advanced roadside bombs, leading to the deaths of over 600 US service
members.
- 2016 Capture of US
Navy Sailors: The 2016 US–Iran naval incident happened
on January 12, 2016, during the Obama administration. IRGC forces captured
ten US Navy sailors after two riverine command boats drifted into Iranian
territorial waters near Farsi Island in the Persian Gulf.
- 2020 Assassination
of Qasem Soleimani: The US killed Quds Force commander
Qasem Soleimani in Baghdad, a major escalation in the conflict. Soleimani
is reported to be the mastermind of the roadside bombings in Iraq.
- Ongoing Regional
Shadow War: The IRGC continues to support proxy
forces in Syria, Iraq, and Yemen that target US military bases with drones
and missiles.
The IRGC's strategy focuses on "guerrilla warfare" and
"low-intensity conflict," aiming to inflict costs that make the US
presence unsustainable in the Middle East, rather than winning through
conventional battle. But this kind of war escalated in 2026 when the American
forces launched Operation Epic Fury.
Intention
The IRGC intends to expel US military forces from the Middle East,
retaliate for the killing of Qassem Soleimani, and counter US influence in the
region through asymmetric warfare. Their strategy involves targeting US
personnel and interests, supporting proxy militias, and employing cyber warfare
against US infrastructures.
Key aspects of the IRGC's intent and actions include:
- Asymmetric
Warfare: The IRGC-QF utilizes regional proxy
militias in Iraq, Syria, and Yemen to attack US coalition forces and
allies. Rough estimates indicate that the IRGC and its proxy network have
been responsible for the killings of more than 1,000 Americans since 1979.
This total includes US military personnel, diplomats, and civilians killed
in various attacks across the Middle East and elsewhere over the past four
decades.
- Retaliation and
Terror Plotting: Following the 2020 killing of Qassem
Soleimani, the IRGC has vowed revenge, plotting attacks on American
personnel, civilians, and former officials in the Middle East and around
the world.
- Targeting US
Assets: The IRGC frequently engages in harassment
of US naval vessels, including high-speed boat approaches and drones.
- Cyber
Attacks:
The IRGC operates a robust cyber program capable of, and has engaged in,
attacks on US infrastructure and intelligence-gathering. IRGC hackers had
successfully infiltrated Donald Trump’s 2024 Presidential Campaign email
system, launched major DDoS campaigns against US financial institutions,
and even destroyed Las Vegas Sands Casino’s servers in retaliation for the
political comments made by the owner. Recent cyberattacks by the IRGC and
affiliated groups against the United States have escalated sharply since
late February 2026. The IRGC often operates through front groups or
private contractors to maintain plausible deniability, and these are:
§ § Handala: Focused on data destruction rather than extortion; recent attacks claim retaliation for kinetic strikes.
§ § Seedworm (MuddyWater): Active in cyber espionage and long-term network infiltration of USG and private-sector targets.
§ § Pioneer Kitten: Known for targeting the healthcare, satellite, and defense sectors.
§ § APT42: Specializes in "rapport-building" spear-phishing, often impersonating journalists or think-tank employees to harvest credentials from USG officials.
- Exporting
Revolution: A core, enduring mandate of the IRGC is
to defend the Ayatollah’s regime and project power against the US and its
allies overseas. IRGC and its proxy, Hezbollah, have established a
strategic foothold in Venezuela with the intention of creating a long-term
hub to advance Iranian interests in the Western Hemisphere and establish a
presence near the United States. The US DEA long accused the Iran-backed
militant group Hezbollah of using Venezuela as a base for drug trafficking
and money laundering schemes in collusion with Venezuelan officials and
local cartels. The proceeds from these illicit activities help fund
Hezbollah's operations in the Middle East.
The US officially designated the IRGC as a Foreign Terrorist
Organization (FTO) in April 2019 due to its involvement in these activities.
Pronouncement
Based on reports leading up to the Operation Epic Fury, the IRGC and
Iranian leadership issued several stark warnings and declarations against the
United States, positioning themselves as prepared for a "full-scale hybrid
war."
Key pronouncements and actions by the IRGC and Iranian officials before
the 2026 war included:
- The Morbid Chant: Since 1979, the
IRI government has been chanting DEATH TO AMERICA. The chant "Marg
bar Amrika" is a widely used political slogan in Iran, often
chanted during parliamentary sessions.
- "Finger on
the Trigger" Warning: IRGC commanders warned
that their forces were "more ready than ever, finger on the
trigger," as US warships headed toward the Middle East.
- Retaliation
Threats: The IRGC stated that any US military
strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities would trigger a response that would
"cause deep regret.”
- Escalation
Signaling: An IRGC commander warned that the IRGC's
deterrence posture meant that a strike on its infrastructure would prompt
a faster, broader response than in past engagements, focusing on
"horizontal escalation" against US forces across the Middle East.
- Dismissal of US
Objectives: As tensions peaked, the IRGC dismissed
claims that U.S.-led military campaigns were achieving their goals,
asserting that Iran would "determine the end of the war."
- "Great
Satan" and Regional Threat: The longstanding
designation of the US as the "Great Satan" was reaffirmed, with
then Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei warning that any US attack
would spark a regional war.
- Accusation of
"Full-Scale Hybrid War": The IRGC stated they
were actively engaged in a "full-scale hybrid war" and would not
be intimidated by US pressure.
Before the 2026 war, Iran had also officially designated US military
forces in the region as terrorist organizations (following a similar
designation of the IRGC by the US in 2019) and accused the US of creating,
rather than reducing, regional instability.
Situation
The situation that led to Operation Epic Fury on February 28 was a
combination of stalled diplomatic negotiations, Iran's continued nuclear and
missile ambitions, and immediate maritime escalation.
Military Situation
- US Military
Buildup: Under Operation Epic Fury, the US
conducted its largest military buildup in the Middle East since the 2003
Iraq War. This included the deployment of three aircraft carriers, a dozen
supporting ships, fighter jets, bombers, and air defense batteries.
- Intelligence
Assessments: The US and Israel concluded that Iran
was within weeks of possessing a nuclear weapon. This assessment served as
the primary justification for the subsequent Operation Epic Fury and
Operation Roaring Lion (Israel).
- Regional
Escalation: Before the war, Israel had conducted
near-daily airstrikes against Iranian-backed Hezbollah targets in Lebanon
for nearly a year. Tensions had also been fueled by the October 7, 2023,
Hamas attacks that killed more than a thousand Israelis and subsequent
regional fighting.
- Asymmetric Posture:
Iran maintained an asymmetric strategy, relying on drones, fast-attack
boats, and a network of regional proxies (the "Axis of
Resistance") to counter conventional US and Israeli power.
- Western
Hemisphere, Mexico, and Canada Presence: The
IRGC utilizes a "direct air bridge" to Venezuela to transport
personnel, weapons, and senior intelligence members into South America.
Precise numbers of IRGC-QF members are not publicly disclosed. Still, they
are estimated to number between 5,000 and 15,000 personnel globally, with
a covert presence focused on intelligence gathering, networking with
criminal organizations, and logistical support. Reports in early 2026
indicate that the Quds Force has attempted to recruit cartel-linked individuals
to attack US officials and Iranian dissidents in the US mainland and
Mexico. IRGC-QF operatives targeted the Israeli ambassador to Mexico in
late 2024, showing an active intelligence and operational capability
within the country. Based on reports in 2024 and early 2026, an estimated
700 individuals linked to the IRGC are operating or residing in Canada.
- Missile Force
Projection: In March 2026, the IRGC attempted to
strike the US-UK base at Diego Garcia, 4,000 km (roughly 2,500 miles)
away, using two-stage, long-range ballistic missiles (possibly modified Khorramshahr-class). While the
attempt failed—with missiles either failing or being intercepted—it
demonstrated a major expansion in force projection beyond their declared
2,000 km limit.
Political Situation
- Diplomatic Failure:
Last-minute "last-chance" negotiations in Geneva between the
Trump administration and Iranian officials failed to produce a new deal to
replace the JCPOA, which Trump had dismantled in 2018. Three rounds of
high-stakes negotiations in February 2026—in Muscat, Oman, and in Geneva,
Switzerland—ended in a stalemate. Iran refused to accept a
"zero-enrichment" policy or to include its ballistic missile
program in a new deal.
- Trump's 10-Day
Ultimatum: President Donald Trump issued a 10-day
ultimatum for Iran to comply with US demands regarding its nuclear
program. The operation was launched following Tehran's refusal to meet
these conditions.
- Iranian Internal
Pressure: The IRI government was facing severe
economic pressure from sanctions and widespread domestic unrest before the
war began, and the United States saw it as a window of opportunity to
launch the military campaigns along with Israel.
Nuclear Situation
- Uranium Stockpile:
Based on reports from March 2026, the Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi acknowledged that the
IRGC possesses a stockpile of around 441 kilograms of highly enriched
uranium, which international experts and reports note is enough to produce
material for 10–11 nuclear weapons. The stated amount is approximately 441
kg of 60%-enriched uranium, which is a short technical step away from 90%
weapons-grade levels.
- Quantity for 10
Bombs: IAEA Chief Rafael Grossi stated in
October 2025 that Iran's stockpile of approximately 400 kilograms of 60%
enriched uranium was enough for ten nuclear bombs if enriched further.
Conclusion
Based on June 2025 intelligence assessments following Operation Midnight
Hammer in June 2025 attacks on Iran’s three nuclear sites—Natanz, Fordow, and
Isfahan, US and Israeli officials claimed massive damage to Iranian nuclear
facilities. Still, other assessments and IAEA input suggested that significant
capabilities survived, and while infrastructures were damaged, not all of
Iran’s enriched uranium stockpile was eliminated.
Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi claimed to CBS NEWS that
around 440 kilograms of 60%-enriched uranium is under the rubble, and Iran has
no plans to retrieve the near‑weapons‑grade material. This is the same Araghchi
who, on February 26, claimed that Iran deliberately limits its ballistic
missile range to 2,000 km. However, this claim contradicts reports from March
2026, which suggest Iran demonstrated a 4,000 km range by targeting the British
base on Diego Garcia, bringing European targets like London, Madrid, and Munich
within reach.
On February 26, the US Intelligence Community assessed that IRI was only
weeks away from enriching enough uranium to produce a low-level nuclear device.
Likewise, Vienna-based International Atomic Energy Agency, as reported by the
Associated Press said, “The significantly increased production and accumulation
of high enriched uranium by Iran, the only non-nuclear weapon State to produce
such nuclear material, is of serious concern” and that “approximately 42
kilograms of 60% enriched uranium is theoretically enough to produce one atomic
bomb, if enriched further to 90%.” One device could be used by IRGC-QF and/or
Hezbollah operators in North America or the Western Hemisphere (See
Situation-Western Hemisphere, Mexico, and Canada Presence).
Finding that the IRI negotiators, led by Abbas Araghchi, were not amenable to the USG's demands, the final round of nuclear negotiations involving Jared Kushner and Steve Witkoff concluded on February 26, 2026, in Geneva, where they reportedly described the Iranian proposal presented on the final day as being "full of holes." Araghchi’s team walked out of the negotiation table. This validated the old report by Al Jazeera on June 4, 2025, when Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei firmly stated that Iran will not abandon its uranium enrichment, rejecting US demands for a complete halt. Khamenei described calls to stop enrichment as "nonsense" and asserted it is crucial for Iran's energy independence and technological progress.
Two days after the nuclear negotiation ended, the US Intelligence Community and Israel's Mossad received information that the senior leadership of the then Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei would meet in one building in Tehran at the same time, which led to President Trump approving the launch of Operation Epic Fury, as both USG and Israel saw the “window of opportunity” in front of them, which might not happen again.
Considering the IRGC’s capability to enrich uranium into weapons grade
in weeks, ability to produce ballistic missiles at a range of 2000 kilometers
(now revealed to be 4000 Kilometers), its history of asymmetric warfare with
the United States since 1980s that killed thousands of Americans, its intention
of targeting US national security interests here and abroad with proxies or
otherwise, its pronouncements of killing the American infidels and Death to
America, and the intelligence assessment that IRGC can choke the world economy
via Strait of Hormuz, it is unlikely for Joe Kent to say that Iran does not
pose imminent threat to the United States (or even to the Middle East and the
rest of the world).
When it comes to nuclear issues and threats, especially from a country
labeled as a State-Sponsored Terrorist Regime, the USG generally considers “all
bets on the table” to mean, in national security terms, that all military
options, peace negotiations, diplomatic proposals, or political risks are under
consideration, or in play. It indicates a situation in which everything is
exposed, and no option is off-limits. This reminded me of my Hostage Rescue
Operations class when a student raised this scenario: A terrorist group has
kidnapped the President of the United States, and if their demands are not met,
they would kill the President and detonate a portable nuclear bomb on the
mainland. What would be the USG’s response? Our CIA instructor replied in one
sentence: Find the portable nuclear bomb at all costs and let the President
die, if he cannot be rescued alive. You got my point. Nuclear threat is a
paramount concern to the US Government.
The United States is dealing with a regime that has a nihilistic
mindset, akin to a religious terrorist that uses violence to further what they
see as a divinely commanded purpose. The suicidal behaviors of the religious
terrorists deepen the degree of concern about their existence because of their
religious adherence to jihad (holy war). Their willingness to die for
their cause makes them dangerous, as exemplified by the suicidal operations of
the al-Qaeda members on 9/11.
If an Islamist regime could kill 35,000 plus of its people in January
2026 for protesting, execute more than 2000 Iranians in 2025 for religious
violations, and send 36,000 schoolchildren to their deaths as
"human-wave" attacks, including clearing minefields, as part of IRGC
tactics during the Iran-Iraq War, would the IRGC-QF hesitate to kill hundreds
of thousands "American infidels" using a nuclear bomb? Or strike the
“Zionist Regime” or hit the blasphemous Madrid, Paris, London? The presence of
hundreds of IRGC-QF operators at the United States' doorsteps should raise a
great alarm for the USG. Remember, it only took 19 al-Qaeda members to bring
the United States to its knees and change the way Americans live their lives
after 9/11. This must never happen again. Ever.
Going back to Joe Kent’s assertion that the Islamic Republic of Iran
posed no imminent threat to the United States, I would say that his assessment
was more of a personal protest than an official pronouncement, as he was
compartmentalized from intelligence briefings weeks leading up to Operation
Epic Fury due to leaking intelligence reports, and that created stigma.
But, granting that Joe Kent did not know the imminent threat, as he was
the man on the outside looking in, I would present that before 9/11, the US
Intelligence Community had no intelligence about the 19 Saudi Arabian nationals
planning to crash four airplanes into the Twin Towers, the Pentagon building,
and possibly the White House, where the plane landed in Shanksville,
Pennsylvania. No intelligence on hitting the country. Nada.
On that fateful morning on September 11, the world stood still, and the
Americans said: Never Again. Since then, the USG, in terms of national
security matters, appears to follow the Bush Doctrine, which asserted the
United States’ right to launch preemptive or preventive war to dismantle
terrorist threats abroad before they could reach the US mainland. It
establishes the right of the United States to use military force against
perceived threats before they materialize into real attacks. Bring it to them
before they can bring it home. It shifted foreign policy toward unilateral
action and regime change, seeking to destroy threats where they lived, before
the enemies could bring their evil plans to decimate hundreds of thousands of
Americans in the homeland using a nuclear device or otherwise; thus, the
Operation Epic Fury.
Never Again.
%20(1).jpg)
.jpg)